Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Migrant crisis

15 GOP states ask court to keep Trump-era immigration rule Title 42

The Biden administration has been attempting to end the policy, which expelled millions of migrants at the border.

A migrant waits to be processed by the border patrol after crossing the US-Mexico border near Tijuana on Nov. 11, 2022.

Fifteen Republican states on Monday night asked a federal judge to keep a Covid-era policy in place that allowed authorities to severely restrict asylum-seekers from crossing the border into the country after the judge issued a ruling last week that blocked the rule.

The GOP states said that lifting the rule, which the Biden admin straight has sought to end, will increase the flow of migrants and “directly harm” them.

“Because invalidation of the Title 42 Orders will directly harm the States, they now seek to intervene to offer a defense of the Title 42 policy so that its validity can be resolved on the merits, rather than through strategic surrender,” the states said in their filing Monday. 

They argue that an increase in migrant flows to the border will “impose financial burdens on the states involuntarily hosting them” and that the states themselves are “entitled to special solitude in the standing analysis.”

“The States have sovereign and quasi-sovereign interests in controlling their borders, limiting the persons present within those borders, excluding persons carrying communicable diseases, and the enforcement of immigration law,” the filing said.

Judge blocks Trump-era policy that expels asylum-seekers at the U.S. border

Last week, U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan vacated the controversial rule, known as Title 42, which U.S. Customs and Border Protection has used to turn back migrants at the border before they could make asylum claims. Sullivan sided with the American Civil Liberties Union and other immigration advocates, who argue that the rule was being used a tool to enforce the border more than a public health measure.

Sullivan cited the Administrative Procedures Act in his ruling, and characterized Title 42 as “arbitrary and capricious.” The Biden administration indicated that it won’t oppose Sullivan’s order in a court filing last week, but requested a temporary delay in lifting Title 42.

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Bulldog Regional/Local

Kentucky State Police have confirmed they are conducting an investigation into the allegations


Also , Begged Joe To Run For WH To Salvage His Own Reputation And Made Porn Films With Prostitutes. Forensic Experts Prove Laptop IS...

National News

By Mark Hansel Bulldog Report managing editor The inaugural Freedom Fest in Morning View, Kentucky, drew a crowd of thousands to the farm of...


Letter from St. E doctors and other healthcare professionals expresses strong opposition to mandate Deters law has received a copy of a letter from...